Campaign logo

SAVE OUR WATERWAYS WEB SITE

Reporting and energising the campaign against the cuts made by DEFRA.

Campaign logo

AN EDITORIAL VIEW

from Mike Stevens, SOW webmaster.

3 May

The campaign has now been going for much longer than some of us originally thought would be necessary. This is mainly because the Government's Comprehensive Spending Review for the next three years appears to have been put on the back burner until Tony Blair's replacement is in office.

The campaign has attracted a lot of attention and support in Parliament. The Early Day Motions attracted over 200 signatures from MPs of all parties. There have been three Adjournment Debates and a number of Parliamentary Questions inspired by our campaign, all of which are linked to from our In Parliament page. The Liberal Democrats formally supported our campaign by a resolution at their Spring Conference.

Support for our campaign from groups other than waterways groups is growing, if not as quickly as we would like.

Our paper petition gained some 38,000 signatures, and is likely to presented as soon as the new Prime Minister is in office. Our electronic one got 7205 signatures. The Prime Minister's Office has now replied to the latter, and this reply can be read here.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee set up an enquiry into British Waterways looking and funding and other issues. This has now nearly finished taking evidence. The uncorrected transcripts of the oral evidence are linked to from our In Parliament page. Some of the more optimistic among us detect signs in the evidence from the Waterways Minister, Barry Gardiner MP, that he may be paving the way for the Government to change its position.

The public part of our campaign continues, now using as its vehicle the large number of waterways events due to take place over the Summer. Supporters who are involved in running such events are invites to contact us.

There is still a need to write to MPs, and our advice for those planning such letters has been up-dated in the light of developments.

28 December

DEFRA have now announced its funding plans for its dependent bodies for 2007/8. As far as concerns BW these perpetuate the level of funding after the cuts in the current year, which is in breach of the Waterways Minister's repeated statement that the cuts were for a single year only. This inconsistency has been challenged in an excellent IWA Press Release. For the EA the signs are much harder to read, as only their overall cut has been announced, and it is for them to decide what part of this should be passed on to their (fairly small) waterways section. Of course, it's highly likely that DEFRA has very little room for manoeuvre without an increase in funding from the Treasury.

One might guess that Barry Gardiner, the Waterways Minister, is less than fully committed to the cause of proper funding from the waterways, as witness his ducking-out of several opportunities to join in the debate. He may also be far too junior to carry much clout in his discussions with his boss, David Milliband. One might further guess that the reason the Treasury hasn't come up with any help is that (as was revealed by the official who represented DEFRA at the BW AGM) Milliband hasn't actually asked the Chancellor for any. And why might he not have done so? Perhaps he's trying to curry favour and look after his possible promotion in the Cabinet reshuffle that will follow a change of Prime Minister.

So we now need to shift much more of our campaign efforts to aim at Gordon Brown.

18 December

We had our meeting on Sunday. After reviewing what we did in November, we felt fairly pleased by the publicity we had achieved. Then we turned our attention to Phase 2 and, particularly, Phase 3 of the campaign.

For Phase 2 we still need more boats for the Jan 16 protest cruise past Parliament. See here for details.

We agreed to change the date for the Phase 3 weekend to 3 & 4 March, with the petition delivery a few days later, in order to be able to collect signatures at the Boat & Caravan Show at the NEC in Birmingham. We felt unanimously that for Phase 3 we need to aim for much more explicit participation by non-boating waterway users and local communities. A number of ideas were put forward and we agreed not to adopt a common formula for all events, but go encourage a diversity of approaches to suit local circumstances. Some of the events will be at the same locations as some of the November ones, others at different places. We're keen to recruit more local organisers so that we can have even more events in Phase 3 than we did in Phase 1.


15 December

Our protest weekend on November 25/26 is now behind us. We had a total of 26 events, big and small, and achieved a lot of media coverage, mainly local. Reports on the events can be seen here. We also collected a huge number of petition signatures. That was just phase 1.

Plans for phase 2, our protest cruise past Parliament on 16 January, are now firm, (details here) and we hope that will achieve more national coverage.

Phase 3 is for another nation-wide protest weekend, originally planned for late February but now possibly to be re-scheduled for early March. The SOW steering group is meeting in a couple of days with (as many as can come of) the people who organised the events of phase 1. This meeting is to evaluate phase 1 and to forward the planning for phase 3. I hope we'll have some announcements for you arising from this meeting. There is a growing consensus among the group that we need a different style of for that phase, with much more emphasis on non-boating users and local communities (although we'll still want plenty of boats involved - that's what the press photographers like).

Our electronic petition to 10 Downing Street is collecting signatures rapidly. At its present rate of progress it's likely to reach 3,500 by the end of today.

There are already encouraging signs that our campaign is having an effect. A third round of cuts threatened by DEFRA for this autumn was called off.

The Parliamentary end of the campaign is getting very lively.

  • Three new Early Day Motions were tabled as soon as the new session of Parliament began, and have since been joined by others. The lead one, EDM 90, is now nearing 200 signatures. Considering that Ministers, their junior aides, their opposition opposite number and Whips are not allowed by parliamentary protocol to sign, that's an impressive proportion of those eligible to sign.
  • Sir Peter Soulsby's adjournment debate was re-scheduled for early December and was well worth listening to, with a large number of contributions including some outstandingly good ones. In his reply to the debate, Ben Bradshaw (a minister at DEFRA standing-in for the Waterways Minister Barry Gardiner) said that BW is now in dialogue about its future funding not only with DEFRA but now also with the Cabinet Office. I take this to mean that our efforts have lifted the discussion to a higher level. The Hansard report of the debate is here.
  • And most recently we learn that the relevant Select Committee of the Commons is to hold an enquiry into the work of BW and has invited submissions. Details here. This means not only that we can put our point of view, but also that BW will be under a legal duty to answer questions truthfully without having to be careful of the interests of their paymasters at DEFRA.

KEEP UP THE MOMENTUM!


8 November 2006

The campaign has built up good momentum. As I write this, we have at least 21 events planned up and down the country (plus one in Australia!) for our first campaign weekend, in just over a fortnight's time. Some of these are run by boat clubs and branches of national organisations. Others are run by small groups of individuals (in one case, a single chap).

Already the campaign's voice has been heard in Parliament (see here), although progress on this front has been interrupted by the end of the Parliamentary year, when some things come to an end and have to be re-started after the Queen's Speech on November 15th. One of the three Early Day Motions that were tabled (these are a way of showing back-bench opinion) gathered 163 signatures - a very respectable total given that Ministers, Shadow Ministers and their Parliamentary underlings are barred by convention from signing such motions.

Inevitably it is boaters who have made the running in the early stages of the campaign, as we are the people who most easily see ourselves in the front line of the cuts. But the canoeists and anglers are on board with us, and I'm finding a lot of support among passers-by on the towpath. BW estimates that last year there were 300 million visits to their waterways. This absolutely dwarfs the few thousand boats using them. If our campaign is to succeed in changing the mood of the Government, we need to mobilise support from all of these. Let this be one of the themes of our campaign events.


6 October 2006

The waterways of England and Wales are facing their most severe crisis for many years, possibly the most severe since the immediate post-WWII years when many people expected the whole canal system to close down within a few years. While the present crisis is not as great as the worst fears of 1946, it is unmistakably severe. The cuts already imposed by DEFRA on the budgets of the Environment Agency and, more immediately, of British Waterways, will set back by a huge amount the advances that have been made in the last 60 years. If the projected further cuts in the next few years take place, the results will be catastrophic.

If all of these cuts go ahead, then the levels of maintenance needed to keep the canals in the condition we know today (some would say even in the condition we know them today) will simply not be affordable, and many canals will regress to the sad state they were in 40 or more years ago.

Some canals may well close, BW have warned. The ones at most risk of this are probably among the more recently restored ones whose restoration in many cases has been (at least in their later stages) substantially funded by major grant-awarding bodies such as the various Lottery funds. What a waste of money this will prove if the canals close and revert to their former dereliction.

Who does this effect? Most obviously the people in the front line will be the boaters, who will find themselves with worse-maintained waterways, a reduced cruising range and fewer facilities, for all of which they will be asked to pay a much-increased licence fee. But they won't be the only sufferers. Towpath maintenance is likely also to be reduced, to the detriment of walkers and cyclists. Silted canals will offer less sport for anglers. There will be an inevitable decline in the tourist revenue earned by the canals, and many canalside businesses may become uneconomical. This will have a strongly negative effect on the economics of waterside communities, who will also suffer a direct loss of the canal as a local amenity. And house-owners and business who have chosen their present location in part for the pleasant vista of a waterway will not be very happy if that waterway degenerates to a stinking, abandoned ditch.

And why is it happening? Because the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has made an utter hash of an entirely different part of its responsibilities and incurred a massive fine which we, the waterways users and lovers are being asked to help pay for. That makes us very angry,

But a campaign to get the decisions changed is winnable. The crucial pressure points in the Government's budgetary process fall within the next few months. These must be our first campaign targets.

If we don't get all we want then, there are two other important milestones in the future. We are told to expect a change of Labour leader within the next year. This will result in a change of Ministerial responsibilities, almost certainly a large one. It is at such times that the departmental structure of the government machine sometimes changes. It would probably not take much pressure to make an incoming Prime Minister do away with a lame-duck department like DEFRA and move its responsibilities elsewhere. And perhaps the waterways will find themselves with more sympathetic, as well as more competent, paymasters. And if the fight has to be even more prolonged, there will be a General Election to follow.

But we must concentrate for now on those early target dates, and we must work together. Ten national organisations including SOW) have banded together in this campaign.

Top of page Go to the top of this page.
Home page
Link to home page

Index page
Link to index page

This site is maintained by Mike Stevens
E-mail  me
E-mail me.

This page first up-loaded 6 October 2006 and last up-dated 1 May 2007.