|
Grant-in-Aid cuts - British Waterways
British Waterways has now made public that it has been told
that its grant-in-aid for the financial year April 2006 to March 2007 has been
cut by a further 7.5% (£4.5 million) in addition to the 5% (approximately
£3.1 million) cut that was made in March 2006 and that there is the
possibility of a yet further cut of 2.5% (£1.5 million) to be applied
this autumn. In total, this would mean a loss of over £9 million to BW in
the year, with 15% of its grant-in-aid lost.
BWs grant comes from both the Department for
Environment Food & Rural Affairs and the Scottish Executive. This year, BW
was originally advised that it should plan to receive £73.5 million
grant-in-aid. Of this, £62.5 million was to come from the Department and
£10.9 million from the Scottish Executive. The remainder is earned by BW
or comes in the form of specific project funding from local authorities,
lottery funders etc. The grants from both the Department and the Scottish
Executive were agreed in 2005. The Scottish Executive still intends to pay its
grant to BW in full in 2006/07.
Owing to apparent calamitous mismanagement within the
Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs, it has been unable to meet
its obligations. This was first realised during March 2006, when the first cut
to BWs budget was made. Since then, the Departments financial
position has worsened. The department must pay a large fine to the European
Union for its failure to make prompt payments to farmers via the Rural Payments
Agency. The Department has also incurred substantial overspends in correcting
the systems that makes payments to farmers and on some other projects. No
further funding is available from Treasury so the Department has decided to cut
further the budgets of its responsibilities other than those related to
payments to farmers.
The Department is now briefing BW (and the Environment
Agency and the Broads Authority) about the next Comprehensive Spending Review.
This is a process beginning now by which departmental spending for the years
April 2008 to March 2011 will be decided. It has advised BW that its grant will
be required to decrease still further from the level to which it has now been
cut in this financial year. The consequence of this is that BW is likely to
lose planned funding of £60 million over the five years from 2006/07 to
2010/11.
BW has begun to assess the implications of the likely need
to make savings of between £10 million and £12 million per annum
over the next five years and has indicated that it may need to delay or abandon
some waterway restoration programmes, close some waterways, shed considerable
numbers of employees and increase boat licence fees, possibly by 30% initially.
IWA is deeply concerned by the implications of such a
substantial loss of funding and the weakening of British Waterways at a time
when it is making attempts to become more financially secure as a matter of its
own agenda. At its September meeting, the Associations Council intends to
discuss a possible reallocation of IWAs resources to enable it to mount
an appropriate campaign, and is likely to need the considerable support of
members and other volunteers to help to make ministers and other decision
makers aware of the consequences of the mismanagement with the Department and
the need to review its funding decision-making process.
There are two key decision points in government in the near
future, where the impact of public opinion could make a difference. Department
for Environment Food & Rural Affairs ministers are due to make financial
settlements for the next few years with the Treasury during the next few
months. This will probably not happen until early 2007, but the weight of
public opinion will need to be conveyed to ministers during the period
September 2006 to Christmas so that they understand that cutting grant
allocation to the navigation authorities would be very unpopular. The second
decision point is when the Departments ministers apportion the budget
that it gets from the Treasury. This is likely to happen in spring 2007 and
further lobbying will be required in the run up to it.
Grant-in-Aid cuts - Environment Agency
The Environment Agency also faces dramatic cuts to its
budgets similar to British Waterways. Fortunately, the impact on the navigation
function with the Agency has been absorbed for the current financial year, but
other parts of the Agencys work, particularly flood defence, have been
extremely hard-hit, and this in turn is likely to have adverse implications for
navigation in due course. The Agencys proposed increase in boat licence
fees of nearly 50% over three years looks very likely to go ahead, despite
complete opposition by inland waterways interests.
The sweetener to the proposed large licence increase was
that they were being more than matched by funding from central government for
capital repairs over the next few years. Waterway user groups had, however,
been sceptical of this pointing out that the proceeds of substantial
increases levied on the Thames about 15 years ago for lock enlargement had not
been applied for their intended purposes owing to budget cuts at the time. The
same scenario could now repeat itself, with the licence increases being forced
through, and the promised capital works in future years now falling under
threat because of the mismanagement within the Department for Environment Food
& Rural Affairs. |